Daily news and commentary on the key issues involving radio and the Internet Link to previous issue Link to next issue   
     


Welcome!
Contact RAIN
Feedback form

Hanson Consulting














Proposed
  recordkeeping
  requirements
CARP recommends
   flat-rate royalty
CARP based rate
  on Yahoo! deal
"Day of Silence"
   is on!
20 House members
   write Librarian
Media coverage of
   "Day of Silence"
Copyright Office
  roundtable
House Judiciary
   subcommittee
   hearing
"RIAA may win
  battle but..."
CARP rejected!
Royalty rates
  around world
"Likely" record-
   keeping rules
Senate hearing on
   CARP process
Librarian's decision:
  $.0007/perf.
Congressmen
  weigh response
Mark Cuban's
  e-mail to RAIN
KH analysis of
  Cuban e-mail
Yahoo halts
  Broadcast.com
  streams
VOW petitions
  Congress
Million Fax March
Labels to Net Radio:
  Die now
NAB legal appeal
KPIG drops streaming
Small webcasters
  benefit concert
Internet Radio
  Fairness Act
Artemis Records to
  allow free streaming
Webcasters, labels
  appeal LOC ruling

Librarian wants to
  block some appeals

Moby speaks out
RIAA, small web-
  casters talking
"Webcasters, labels
  need to compromise"
Royalty Voodoo
  Economics Pt. 1
BRS study shows US
  'casters leaving Net
B'casters move to
  "stay" fees
Inslee calls CARP
  "terrible legislation"
Small 'casters return
  to Capitol Hill
"Compromise will pay
  off for everyone"
Simson says talks
  are progressing
H.R. 5469
"Call your
  Congressman"
Conyers speaks out
  against H.R. 5469
H.R. 5469 pulled,
  deal may be near
Artists willing to kill
  webcasting for $0?
Details of possible deal
Will broadcasters
  block the deal?
An agreement reached
"Webcaster royalty is
  technological
  fetishism"
Artist/label dispute
  threatens
  compromise
H.R. 5469 passes
  House!
New deal doesn't help
  college stations
RAIN's summary
   of H.R. 5469
Benefits, options of
  H.R. 5469
How to save the bill
VOW letter to Senate
Copyright Office
  denies b'casters'
  stay motion
"RIAA motivation and
  the impact of SWAA"
SWAA pros & cons
SWAA dies in Senate
RAIN proposes post-
  SWAA action
Live365 stay motion
  denied
SoundExchange offers
  "minimum fee" plan
Live365 files
  emergency stay
Net radio copyright
  basics pt. 1
Net radio copyright
  basics pt. 2
Tentative agreement
  on 5469
Congress passes
  SWSA
RAIN answers
  SWSA questions
President signs
  SWSA into law


Past issues
Site reviews
Guest essays
Metrics analysis

Copyright Law
DMCA



Arbitron's Measurecast
Ratings:
Weekly:
Week of Mar. 3
Week of Feb. 24
Week of Feb. 17
Week of Feb. 10

Monthly:
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002

Click here to make RAIN your default homepage!


We'll send you a brief daily summary of each day's stories with a clickable link to the RAIN home page.

 

 

The Future of Radio Part 2 of 5
Headline: Consumer benefits driving growth of new deliver mechanism
BY KURT HANSON
In yesterday's issue of RAIN (here), I drew from a new speech called "The Future of Radio," that I've been Photo: Kurt Hansondelivering at radio conferences around the world lately (albeit not yet in the U.S.), and expressed the following opinion:

There are technological and cultural changes going on right now that will have a major impact on how consumers will access and use radio in the future — and the U.S.'s radio broadcast group owners are understandably but perhaps dangerously ignoring those trends.

Today,
we'll look at how the perceived-as-dead Internet radio medium has actually achieved a midday audience of hundreds of thousands of listeners... and why that has happened. Tomorrow, we'll look at some factors that I believe will cause that growth to ramp up significantly in the next two to five years.


"Dead" medium has benefits that
appeal to certain groups of consumers
Yesterday, we looked at current radio industry attitudes towards new delivery mechanisms such as satellite and Internet Image: First Law of Technologyradio in the context of the "First Law of Technology" (see slide at left) which suggests that people will tend to underestimate the long-term impact of such new technologies.

True to the law's prediction, most US broadcasters in 2003 have pretty much abandoned their Internet radio initiatives, concluding that since initial wild predictions of growth didn't come to pass, the medium is "over."

Consumers, on the other hand, have not abandoned their interest at all! Internet-delivered radio offers several benefits that are apparently appreciated by certain types of consumers: (1) More formats than the 20 or so that there are room for on the FM spectrum in any given city — hundreds, in fact, including pop standards, Image: Benefits of Internet radiojazz vocals, alternative country, Broadway from various decades, traditional jazz, electronica, Americana, blues, and more. (2) Low spot load, at least currently — one or two spots per hour versus the 10 to 20 that are now standard on broadcast radio. (3) "Now Playing" information available continuously (in text form). (4) Interactivity — including, for example, the ability to pause or skip a song.

And for many office workers, a key benefit is: (5) No radio required! For many millions of people who do not have an AM/FM radio at their desks but do have a broadband-enabled PC, Internet radio is a more convenient way to get music in their work space.

Image: Internet radio can be a lower-quality productNote, however, that on several key attributes of performance, Internet radio is a lower-quality product (at least today, anyway) than broadcast radio. (This fact will become extremely important later this week when we look at the type of new technology that Internet radio is — a "disruptive" or "sustaining" one)

Specifically, most Internet radio stations today choose to stream at a bitrate that means they have worse sound quality than FM radio. And it's not portable — you can't listen in the bathroom or kitchen or in your car or on a Walkman. And the Internet-only stations typically have dead air between songs and lack such "quality" elements as DJs and contests,


Internet radio "not happening?"
Current midday AQH is 500,000 and growing

On the whole, however, the benefits, at least for certain consumers, apparently outweigh the disadvantages, as the medium continues to gain audience.

It's somewhat difficult to see this, however, as the industry's published "ratings" reports require the active participation of webcasters before they can be included. Thus, ratings tabulations are to some extent more a measure of the ratings firm's success in signing up clients than they are a measure of industry growth or decline.

Image: Rated webcasts are the tip of the iceberg As shown in the graphic at right, I believe that the "top networks" in ratings reports are just the "tip of the iceberg" in terms of the size of the medium's audience. The top four networks in a recent Measurecast report, for example, may actually be only four of the top eleven or twelve webcasters when you add in such probably-major players as Shoutcast, Radio@AOL, MSN Music, Yahoo! Launch, and others.

Add up reasonable estimates for the REAL top twelve, make some reasonable assumptions about the rest of the players, and you'll get a monthly TTSL for Internet radio of about 140,000,000 hours. Divide by the number of hours in a month and you'll get a full-week AQH for the medium of about 250,000 listeners. Factor in the typical hour-by-hour pattern for the medium (it's extremely heavy Mon-Fri 9AM-5PM), and you'll get a midday AQH of about 500,000. (In the full speech, I go into this in more detail.)

That's not insignificant! It's about 2% of the size of the total U.S. midday broadcast radio audience. It's about the same midday audience size as Atlanta's, which is the #11 market in the US And if it continues to grow at its current rate, the medium's midday audience size will be the same as San Francisco's by the end of this year, Chicago's by the end of next year, and New York's not too long after that.

However, the medium's growth may take off on a whole new, faster trajectory in the near future due to certain technological changes I've already alluded to. We'll look at that tomorrow in RAIN. And then, on Thursday, we'll look at the reasons that broadcasters are perhaps inappropriately ignoring this growth.

Read part 3 of our "The Future of Radio" series here.
Part 1 is here.

The Future of Radio The U.S. debut of Kurt's "The Future of Radio" speech (in a slightly-condensed preview version) will take place next week in Las Vegas, immediately preceding the RAIN Reader Cocktail Party at Gordon Biersch Brewery Restaurant (Tuesday, April 7th, at 5:15PM). To reserve a seat for the presentation, call 1-312-527-3879 or write kurt@kurthanson.com.

RAIN Reader Cocktail Party at NAB: Tuesday 4/8 at 5:15pm at Gordon Biersch
If you're planning to attend NAB 2003 in Las Vegas (April 5-10; details here), we hope you'll join us for our RAIN reader get-togther. We've reserved the patio of the Gordon Biersch Brewery Restaurant (about a $4 cab ride from the Convention Center) on Tuesday, April 8th.

This year, we've also reserved
a private room for the U.S. debut of Kurt's "The Future of Radio" speech for those who'd like an advance look at it. (Presentation at 5:15pm, cocktails at 5:45pm.) See you there!
 
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 

Headline: Infinity WILL stream "select stations" as part of AOL deal
BY PAUL MALONEY
Contrary to contrary reports to the contrary
...Infinity Broadcasting now reportedly will allow streaming of certain select radioLink: Infinity Radio properties as part of their promotional deal with America Online Broadband.

AOL issued a press release yesterday that stated other marketing efforts will be "in addition to streams of select Infinity stations on the AOL Radio@Network."

Industry news source AllAccess.com, which first reported that Infinity station streams might be hitting the Internet for the first time ever, now says at least five nationally-known (presumably major-market) outlets will stream as part of the AOL Broadband Internet radio network. The report gave no indication of the source of the information, or when the station streams would begin.

The promotional campaign, in which its 183 Infinity stations will take part, will also include television ads and a marketing tour.

The Viacom-owned Infinity has far fewer stations than Clear Channel, the nation's largest broadcaster with 1,214. Yet with a weekly audience of over 60 million people (and station ownership concentrated in major markets) Infinity joins Clear Channel (which reaches over 104 million listeners weekly) as this country's most prominent radio operators.

However, unlike most other broadcasters, Infinity until now has steadfastly forbidden its stations from streaming their programming on the Internet.
Link: AOL Broadband



















Currently, AOL offers five
broadcast streams as part of its online radio network (circled in the screen shot of Radio@Netscape above).

 


Have an opinion? Drop us a note! (Or, to use your own e-mail software, click here.)

  Your e-mail address:
  Your name (if not obvious from your e-mail address):
    Kurt and Paul, this is deep background -- don't quote me!

        Thanks!

 
Headline: Hearing on CARP reform bill rescheduled for this afternoon
BY PAUL MALONEY
A subcommittee hearing on a bill that would revise the arbitration process that determines copyright royalties — including those for the use of music on Internet radio — has been rescheduled for this afternoon.

The Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property hearing on bill, the "Copyright Royalty and Distribution Reform Act," is now slated for 2 PM ET (1 PM CT) in the Rayburn House Office Building. Streaming audio will be available here. The hearing had originally been scheduled for last Thursday morning.

The bill (H.R. 1417) would revise legislation passed in 1993 that gave the Librarian of Congress the power to assemble Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panels (CARPs) to determine rates for the commercial use of copyrighted works when those rates cannot be determined naturally in the marketplace. The bill is sponsored by Rep. Lamar Smith's (R-TX, pictured above), along with Reps. Howard Berman (D-CA), and John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI), the ranking Democrat of the House Judiciary Committee.

Read more on the bill in RAIN's coverage from Thursday here.
 

We'll send you a brief daily summary of each day's stories with a clickable link to the RAIN home page.
Reader Feedback
Here's feedback on Part 1 of Kurt's five-part series on "The Future of Radio" (yesterday in RAIN here)...

"Truly an ideal time to enter into the streaming content industry..."


Mr. Hanson,

I wanted to let you know that I really enjoyed the first part of your five part series on the future of radio and am eagerly looking forward to the remainder. I am in agreement with your assessment that this is truly an ideal time to enter into the streaming content industry. My opinions are based a few events which seem to be converging at the same time:

1. Decreased competition: Events in 2001 and 2002 with CARP and other bills killed off many broadcasters and have many still in a position requiring them to pay up. Many of the "big fish" left and have yet to return after being burned by the burst. The new fee structure, while not ideal for small broadcasters, are much better than those originally proposed.

2. Increased demand for broadband content: As each month passes the number of homes and businesses which have something better than a dial-up modem increase dramatically. It is now common place to go visit someone's cube and hear them listening to a webcast of something while working. This will only increase as broadband becomes affordable as well as wireless.

3. Continued Development of Peer-to-Peer Broadcasting: For someone like me who is in the process of becoming a new webcaster, bandwidth costs are truly the biggest concern. Within a few months I have already encoded nearly 4,000 music files from my personal record library. I have also registered with ASCAP and should be done shortly with BMI. Yet I am still pondering my desire for a commercial free/listener supported stream in exchange for the services that a Live365 might provide me in lower cost bandwidth. We are closely watching the developments of PeerCast, Abacast and others which would allow us to reach thousands, while still keeping bandwidth costs within reason. That seems like a reality for us this coming year.

So again, we greatly appreciate your article and eagerly look forward to the remainder. We also hope one day soon to see the name of our station on your website at some point soon!

Keep up the great work.

  Patrick J. Conley
VP of the soon to be 80sAirwaves.com
 
Link: Hanson Consulting
 
Upcoming conferences
April 5-10 NAB 2003: Las Vegas
April 13-15 Public Broadcasting Internet Conference: Minneapolis
May 7-9 Interactive Media Conference & Trade Show: San Diego
June 19-21 The R&R 2003 Convention: Beverly Hills
July 7-9 The Radio Festival 2003: Birmingham, UK
August 6-9 The R&R Triple-A Summit: Boulder
October 1-3 The NAB Radio Show: Philadelphia
October 19-21 NAB European Radio Conference: London
October 22-25 CMJ Music Marathon: New York

Search RAIN

(Hint: Use quotes)
Advanced Search

Click Here for AccuRadio

Vendor Guide Ver. 3.0

Link: AccuPortal

Publications
R&R
RBR
Radio Ink
All Access
Inside Radio
   

Internet Pubs.
Red Herring
Business 2.0
   
Other Publications
(was eRadio)
(Taz Media)
FMQB
   

Software for RAIN's daily e-mail reminders provided by:

 


 
 

TOP

Copyright 2003, RAIN Publications, Inc. All rights reserved.
All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Your RAIN staff
Kurt Hanson
Publisher
Paul Maloney
Editor
Ralph Sledge
"Site of the Day" Editor
David Don
Developer
Brad Knutson
Intern
Ben Huh
Project Manager