Due
to coverage of yesterday's late-breaking news of the RIAA/DiMA
webcasting royalties proposal, we've postponed Part 5 of Kurt's
"The Future of Radio"
series until Monday's issue. If you'd like to go back to previous
installments of the series, simply click the following links:
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part
4.
BY PAUL MALONEY The biggest news about yesterday's late-announced webcasting
royalty agreement between the RIAA and DiMA (see yesterday afternoon's
RAIN News Flashhere) is
that it's really no significant change from the 1999-2002 Librarian
of Congress's rate.
The agreement, however, does save both sides a costly
arbitration to settle the rate at which webcasters would
pay royalties to the owners of sound recording copyrights for the
use of their music. .
Late yesterdayDiMA, a lobbying group that represents
mostly large webcasters and technology companies, announced that
it had reached
an agreement with the Recording Industry
Association of America (RIAA)
on a webcasting royalty rate for 2003 and 2004. The joint proposal
was submitted to the Copyright Office, which presumably will publish
the deal for review and comment, then decide whether to approve
it for industry-wide use.
Under the deal, "nonsubscription" webcasters would
have the choice of paying 0.0762 cents
per listener per song (actually slightly higher than the Librarian's
determination), or 1.17 cents
per listener per hour (which means this rate
would be advantageous to the webcaster if the channel averages more
than 15.35 songs per hour). Minimum fees for nonsubscription webcasts
leap to $2,500 per year (from
$500 per year for 1998-2002).
Smaller webcasters those with revenues of less than $500,000
in 2003 will continue to be able to elect, if they prefer,
the rate set in the Small Webcaster Settlement Agreement
10% of the webcaster's first $250K in gross income and 12% of any
additional income (or 7% of expenses, whichever is higher).
"First, webcasters remain at a competitive
disadvantage to terrestrial radio by having to pay huge royalties
for sound recordings that broadcasters get for free," acknowledged
Jonathan Potter (pictured below
right), executive director of the Digital
Media Association (DiMA).
"And second, the arbitration process that determines these
royalties is sorely in need of reform."
Absent a joint industry proposal to the US
Copyright Office, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)
mandates that the Copyright Office convene an arbitration panel
to recommend a royalty rate to the Library of Congress. This arbitration,
known as the Copyright Arbitration royalty panel (CARP)
wasset to begin May 5.
The executive director of SoundExchange,
the record industry body set up to collect and distribute the royalties,
agreed that avoiding arbitration was a benefit, and added that the
proposal would prevent webcasters from "holding out" on
the money they owe.
"Webcasters had stopped paying royalties pending the setting
of new rates even though they continue to exploit sound recordings
for their businesses," said John Simson
(pictured below left) in a press release. "This
action threatened to deprive SoundExchange of royalties necessary
to continue operations, and the Register of Copyrights has even
asked Congress to clarify that webcasters cannot do this in the
future."
Note that this deal includes terms for new subscription-based
models, which can pay the same rates as nonsubscription webcasters,
or instead can pay 10.9% of
the subscription revenues, (but at least 27 cents per month per
subscriber), with a $5,000 per year
minimum for webcasters electing the "percentage-of-subscription-revenue"
rate.
Also note that webcasts of AM/FM broadcasters and those of
noncommercial/nonprofit entities are not
eligible for this deal. Also excluded would be small
webcasters who have elected to pay royalties under the Small
Webcaster Settlement Act of 2002, or SWSA.
Some webcasters complained that the new proposal does nothing
to help the upstart businesses in the industry. According to DiMA's
press release, bigger media companies like RealNetworks, Yahoo!,
America Online, Microsoft, MusicMatch, Listen.com, and FullAudio
support the deal.
Even Potter admitted that this proposal's main benefit would
be to keep the royalty determination out of arbitration. "The agreement
is a temporary band-aid that avoids millions of dollars of legal
fees associated with a broken arbitration process," he said
in yesterday's press release.
DiMA and RIAA Joint Royalty Proposal
License Fees:
Eligible Nonsubscription
Transmission Services
Option of paying royalties as follows:
Per Performance Option
- 0.0762 cents ($0.000762) per performance, except that
4% of performances shall bear no royalty.
Percentage of Subscription Revenues
Option - 10.9% of "Subscription Service Revenues,"
but in no event less than 27 cents per month for each person
who subscribes to the subscription service or to whom service
is delivered without a fee (e.g., during a trial period).
Minimum Fees:
Nonsubscription Services
$2,500 per year
Subscription
Services
Per Performance Option & Aggregate
Tuning Hours Option - $2,500 per year.
Percentage of Subscription Revenues
Option - $5,000 per year.
If
you're planning to attend NAB 2003 in Las Vegas (April 5-10;
details here),
we hope you'll join us for our RAIN reader get-togther.
We've reserved the patio of the Gordon Biersch Brewery Restaurant
(about a $4 cab ride from the Convention Center) on Tuesday,
April 8th.
This year, we've also reserved a private room for the U.S.
debut of Kurt's "The Future of
Radio" speech for those who'd like an advance
look at it. (Please note we've moved the time up a bit. The
presentation will now be at 4:30pm,
and cocktails at 5:00pm.) See
you there!
The
RAIN Reader Cocktail Party at NAB 2003 is co-sponsored by Limelight
Networks, RadioWebStuff, StreamGuys, InvisibleHand
Networks, Ramp^Rate, and RCS. Make plans to
meet representatives of those firms at the event!
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
BY PAUL MALONEY Coverage of the US/Iraqi conflict is driving increased media
use among consumers, and that includes news and talk available
via Internet radio.
ABC Radio's WLS-AM/Chicago
and Clear Channel KFI-AM/Los
Angeles both reached the top ten most-listened-to Net radio channels
according to Arbitron's
Measurecast ratings for the week of March 17. WLS-AM hit number
three with 255,623 hours TTSL (or Total Time Spent Listening). KFI-AM
ranked tenth with a 130,233 TTSL.
And, according to their content delivery service providerSpeedera,
National Public Radio (NPR)
saw a record 8-fold increase in audio usage on the first day of
the war. NPR's site offers original online content
and audio streaming, hourly newscasts, and seven years of archived
audio and information. NPR's online listenership is not rated by
Arbitron.
"With the beginning of the war, we have seen a significant
increase in online tuning to news and talk Internet radio stations,"
said Bill Rose (pictured below
right), vice president and general manager, Arbitron Internet Broadcast
Services, in a press release. "For the week of March 17,
the 65 Talk and News/Talk stations measured by Arbitron MeasureCast
Ratings had a combined 1,389,717 hours of TTSL, nearly three times
the listenership of the same stations for the week of January 27,
which had 493,430 hours of TTSL."
In September of last year, KFI ranked #48 in Measurecast's
monthly rankings (at the time a separate competitor of Arbitron's,
here)
with
just 125,896 TTSL for the month,
while WLS was not rated in the top 50. In fact, Cox News/Talk WSB-AM/Atlanta
was the highest-rated News Talk station at #26, with 182,995 TTSL
for the month. Arbitron's monthly ratings for that
period (here)
have Bonneville news station WTOP-AM/Washington
D.C. at #18 (193,700 TTSL, again, a monthly total), the highest
news or news/talk outlet of all rated stations.
One year prior to that, for the month that included the September
11th terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, WLS was ranked
#27 (64,816 TTSL), while KFI did not appear in those ratings (here,
though WSB-AM was #8 with 137,250 TTSL, and Salem KRLA-AM/Los
Angeles was #16 with 95,525 TTSL). Boston University's WBUR
ranked #4 in Arbitron's list (here),
but with only 187,400 for the entire month.
The
US debut of Kurt's "The Future of Radio" speech
(in a slightly-condensed preview version) will take place next
week in Las Vegas, immediately preceding the RAIN
Reader Cocktail Party at Gordon Biersch Brewery Restaurant
(Tuesday, April 7th, at the new time:
4:30 PM). To reserve a seat for the presentation,
call 1-312-527-3879 or write
kurt@kurthanson.com.
Here's feedback on yesterday's news of a joint RIAA/DiMA proposal
(here, and in
today's issue)...
"Based
on what bit-rate the webcaster streams..."
That deal sounds good however, the rates still seem a bit higher
than what many webcasters are able to
afford.
I think what really needs to be done, if someone hasn't suggested
this already, is instead design a royalty plan that is based on what
bit-rate the webcaster (no matter if it's Net-Only, AM/FM simulcasts,
non-commercial broadcasts, etc.) streams rather than the current CARP
rates.
Webcasters that are streaming a bitrate of 32K or lower quality,
since the low quality sound is least desirable for CD burning, should
only have to pay very little in royalties, while the webcasters that
are streaming a bitrate higher than 32k should have to pay more royalties.
Basically, the higher the bitrate, higher the royalty obligation.
Bill
This is in regards to the announced AOL Broadband/Infinity Radio
partnership (in RAINhere)...
"Infinity
should have looked at subscription models like Real..."
Kurt:
I feel that it will be a complete failure because of AOL's
previous track record.
AOL's
market share is declining because most educated Internet users
can easily find information online without having to go through simplified,
yet cluttered menus. The new Broadband service won't reverse AOL's
current woes, even with the availability of exclusive content such
as Infinity radio stations. Infinity should have looked at an independent
subscription model similar to RealNetworks' RadioPass if they want
to enter the streaming radio arena. Many devout listeners would be
willing to pay a monthly fee in order to receive
KROQ or WFAN on their computers.
Despite Infinity's tiny step in the right direction, I believe
Howard Stern's show will NOT be streamed by any of its stations in
the years to come.