|


BY KURT HANSON
Imagine if you will a radio market that's roughly the
15th largest in the U.S. i.e., about the
size of San
Diego but significantly more appealing, as virtually 100%
of the market's population consists of upscale, adult consumers
(most of whom, additionally, have a tendency toward early adoption
of new products).
Also imagine that, improbable as it sounds, virtually all
of these consumers are listening to the radio on brand-new,
next-generation radio receivers that can display full-color,
animated visuals
synchronized to the radio programming.
Now imagine that instead of the many hundreds of radio advertisers
that are buying spot schedules right now in markets the size of
San Diego, this attractive new radio market has virtually
NO advertising campaigns running.
Improbable? Absurd? Perhaps... but that's the state of Internet
radio today!
Millions of listeners but
no advertisers!
As I'll describe tomorrow in RAIN, the aggregate midday AQH
audience for Internet radio is probably more than 500,000
people and that's at any given moment, drawn from a cume
that several times larger than
that. That's a bigger midday audience than every San Diego station
combined.
It is, legitimately (on weekdays from 9AM ET to 5PM PT, anyway),
the 15th-largest radio market in the U.S.
The downside of Internet radio's audience from an advertiser's
perspective, of course, compared to broadcast radio's audience,
is that
broadcast radio sells the majority of its ad campaigns to local
advertisers, and the Internet
radio audience is dispersed
across the US
On the other hand, of radio's $20 billion in advertising
revenues, $4 billion of that
is spent by network and national spot radio advertisers. For those
advertisers, Internet radio's audience should be extremely desirable,
as it's smoothly and homogeneously
spread across the entire country. 
And Internet radio's audience should be an obvious
buy for any national advertiser that (A) wants to drive people
to its website (e.g., Hotwire.com),
or (B) wants to reach people at work
(e.g., McDonald's to promote its new line of salads or an advertiser
like Office Depot).
Yet... it's not. There have been a few successful "video
gateway" campaigns (short TV spots that play at the start of
a new stream), but there are hardly any radio
spot schedules on the medium today.
Why advertise on Internet radio?
This seems like it would seem to be a fantastic opportunity here
for broadcasters to sell an exciting new subset
of their audience office workers who are listening to their
simulcast streams and perhaps even to bring some new
advertisers to the radio medium.
After all, the benefits of reaching this new audience should
be clearly enticing:
- Quality audience: The vast majority of Internet radio
listening is comprised of consumers who are listening at
work on a broadband-enabled computer, meaning that
they are inherently a high-qualitative-profile group of listeners.
- Low spot load = High attention level: Whereas on broadcast
radio today a spot might end up buried as the 10th spot in a 12-spot
break, on Internet radio, a spot might be the only
spot in the break, meaning that it's far more likely to be heard
and acted upon.
- Accompanying visuals: Most Internet radio stations are
capable of displaying an advertiser's logo while
their spot is playing (typically in a 468-by-60-pixel
banner ad)!
- Website link: Since virtually all Internet radio listeners
today are sitting in front of a computer with a browser
window open, and since an advertiser has 30 seconds
of persuasive audio to communicate with, Internet radio listeners
are perhaps the easiest consumers in the world to entice to visit
a website!
So what's the problem? I have my own opinions, which I'll
describe in RAIN over the next couple of days, plus a proposed
solution, which I'll get to before the week's over.
Meanwhile, I'd welcome your feedback on the subject: Why
do you think we're seeing so
few spot schedules on Internet radio today? Please feel free to
drop me a line at kurt@kurthanson.com
(or simply use the form below).
At any rate, here's my conclusion for today: THIS
SITUATION IS RIDICULOUS!
So let's solve
it. More on that topic tomorrow in RAIN.
TO BE CONTINUED...
|